US: Conflicting reports on UAP amendment in NDAA
Senator Mike Rounds stated the UAP Disclosure Amendment was still part of the National Defense Authorization Act, while Senator Eric Burlison heard it had been removed. This highlights ongoing legislative tensions over UAP transparency.
Background
Background
On September 9, 2025, Senator Mike Rounds (Republican, South Dakota) told NewsNation he was confident that the UAP disclosure amendment would remain in the National Defense Authorization Act. At the same time, Senator Eric Burlison (Republican, Missouri) said he had learned that the amendment had been struck from the bill.
Key Figures and Statements
In an exclusive interview, Mike Rounds emphasised that the measure promoting transparency about government records on unidentified anomalous phenomena would survive. Eric Burlison, who had earlier introduced a similar initiative, contradicted him. Later reporting from January 2026 pointed to Senator McConnell as possibly responsible for its failure and traced financial threads in the defence budget.
Sources and Aftermath
The information comes from a NewsNation piece with Ross Coulthart, an article by Christopher Sharp in Liberation Times, and a piece by Cristina Gomez in UFO/UAP News. The episode illustrates the political struggles over UAP disclosure, which ultimately failed and fuelled debates about transparency and national security. Its significance lies in the continuing controversy over statutory disclosure obligations.